|
|
| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 1 post(s) |
Kazuma Saruwatari
Caldari
   |
Posted - 2008.10.07 03:51:00 -
[1]
Edited by: Kazuma Saruwatari on 07/10/2008 03:52:48
Knowing that this entire "speed" topic is a very controversial topic for many who play EVE as it stands. More often than not, it is a sole reason why people continue to play EVE (because speed is fun), which is why takign any step forward regarding the matter is a delicate and potentially dangerous process to take.
QUESTION:
Considering the huge (and often unseen) implications of even small changes to certain ship stats and mod stats, will you consider a "staggered" deployment of the speed patch so as not to "bite more than you can chew"?
QUESTION:
Will this speed patch eventually give the AF a viable role again besides being a more expensive cruiser in a frigate hull?
QUESTION:
What would happen to speed-based ships like interceptors, Vagabond, all blaster ships, etc once you deploy this speed patch? Will they still retain what basically is a distinct trait and survival tactic that is speed (either as damage avoidance/mitigation or as a method to get within range)?
QUESTION:
What will be the proposed changes to make the MWD not a "mandatory" module alongside the stasis webifier? Most ship setups often suffer from having to fit a MWD, and often make more sense without the MWD.
QUESTION:
Will anti-speed-based weaponry (like javelin missiles) actually be given a reason to be used? Also, will anti-missile deterrents be of use (defenders are basically lolfail)
QUESTION:
Are AB's part of this speed patch and if so, what are the proposed changes?
QUESTION:
Are there any planned changes to the stasis webifier and web disruptor/scramblers? If so, what are the proposed changes?
QUESTION:
Will ships currently ingame affected by the speed patch be given a new role in case their old one becomes invalid after the patch?
-
|
Kazuma Saruwatari
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.10.08 11:27:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: REV001
Where is the written update on the changes that has been promised and never came ?
Everyone flooded the thread demanding for it and everyone had their own ideas that sounded far better than what CCP could think up and so didnt release their changes instead for fear of embarrasment?
...what it was a hypothesis
-
|
Kazuma Saruwatari
Caldari
|
Posted - 2008.10.09 12:52:00 -
[3]
Have all of you lost your eardrums or something?
Give the live dev blog another listen
It doesnt sound like they're about to break their baby that is EVE. Heck, they're trying to FIX it actually, thanks to you lot whoever has HG snakes and broke the physics engine by going above 8000m/s.
-
|
|
|
| |
|